America
Key Joe Biden officials barred from contacting social media platforms
San Francisco, July 5
In a far-reaching ruling that has implications for other countries too, a judge in the US has barred key officials at the Joe Biden administration from contacting social media platforms about moderating posts and censoring conservative viewpoints protected by the First Amendment.
The ruling by judge Terry A. Doughty at US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana bars Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) leader Jen Easterly, and FBI Foreign Influence Task Force leader Laura Dehmlow, as well as employees of those agencies “from contacting, working with, or asking social media companies about posts protected by the First Amendmentâ€.
The judge wrote that plaintiffs are likely to prove that federal government officials are targeting and suppressing “millions of protected free speech postings by American citizensâ€, reports The Verge.
“The explosion of social media platforms has resulted in unique free speech issues -- this is especially true in light of the Covid-19 pandemic. If the allegations made by Plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack against free speech in United States' history,†the ruling said.
“In their attempts to suppress alleged disinformation, the Federal government... is alleged to have blatantly ignored the First Amendment's right to free speech,†it added.
A White House official told the media that “our consistent view remains that social media platforms have a critical responsibility to take account of the effects their platforms are having on the American people, but make independent choices about the information they presentâ€.
The Justice Department was reviewing the ruling while evaluating its next steps.
According to reports, Republican attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri sued President Joe Biden, Anthony Fauci, the CDC, DHS, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, claiming that “starting in 2017 -- four years before Biden was President -- officials within the government began laying the groundwork for a ‘systemic and systematic campaign’ to control speech on social mediaâ€.
The plaintiffs alleged that defendants “have colluded with and/or coerced social-media platforms to suppress disfavoured speakers, viewpoints, and content on social-media platformsâ€.
54 minutes ago
World Interfaith Harmony Week celebrations in New York
5 hours ago
FIA’s 43rd Dance Pe Chance Brings 870 Children Together Battling Subzero wind chills
9 hours ago
Greer said US will raise tariffs if no progress made on non-tariff barriers: South Korean FM
15 hours ago
Rishab Shetty says 'life feels better when you hold my hand' on 9 years of marital bliss
16 hours ago
Sidharth Malhotra, Tamannaah Bhatia to shoot special folklore dance sequence for ‘Vvan’ in Mumbai
16 hours ago
Anshula shares a glimpse of sister Sonam Kapoor performing baby shower 'pooja' with husband
16 hours ago
After allegations of illegally entering WB college, Aamir Khan shares heartwarming note for Arijit Singh
16 hours ago
Rahul Gandhi says LS Speaker 'committed' to allow him to speak, Rijiju hits back
16 hours ago
'Would be proud moment': BJP backs Bhagwat’s call to confer Bharat Ratna on Savarkar
16 hours ago
Terror accused Abdul Rahman killed inside Faridabad Jail, Kashmiri inmate arrested
16 hours ago
Kerala HC orders fresh gold testing, vigilance probe into Sabarimala temple case
16 hours ago
Uproar in Rajya Sabha as Oppn MPs raise slogans, seeking to mention LS issues
16 hours ago
Women Cong MPs write to LS Speaker, reject ‘baseless’ allegations of obstructing PM Modi
