Technology
Discouraging words from robot players do hurt gamers
New Delhi, Nov 19
Not just from fellow participants, discouraging words coming from humanoid robots like "you are a terrible player" during the play hurt gamers the most and impair their game, reveal new research from Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) presented at Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) conference in New Delhi.
The trash talk coming from machines was decidedly mild, with utterances such as "Over the course of the game your playing has become confused."
Even so, people who played a game with the robot -- a commercially available humanoid robot known as Pepper -- performed worse when the robot discouraged them and better when the robot encouraged them.
"One participant said, 'I don't like what the robot is saying, but that's the way it was programmed so I can't blame it,'" said lead study author Aaron M. Roth.
Some of the 40 study participants were technically sophisticated and fully understood that a machine was the source of their discomfort.
The researchers found that, overall, human performance ebbed regardless of technical sophistication.
The study is a departure from typical human-robot interaction studies, which tend to focus on how humans and robots can best work together.
"This is one of the first studies of human-robot interaction in an environment where they are not cooperating," said co-author Fei Fang, assistant professor in the Institute for Software Research.
"We can expect home assistants to be cooperative," she said, "but in situations such as online shopping, they may not have the same goals as we do".
The researchers used the game called "Guards and Treasures" which is a typical game used to study defender-attacker interaction in research on security games.
Each participant played the game 35 times with the robot, while either soaking in encouraging words from the robot or getting their ears singed with dismissive remarks.
Although the human players' rationality improved as the number of games played increased, those who were criticized by the robot didn't score as well as those who were praised.
"It's well established that an individual's performance is affected by what other people say, but the study shows that humans also respond to what machines say," said Afsaneh Doryab, systems scientist at CMU's Human-Computer Interaction Institute (HCII).
The trash talk coming from machines was decidedly mild, with utterances such as "Over the course of the game your playing has become confused."
Even so, people who played a game with the robot -- a commercially available humanoid robot known as Pepper -- performed worse when the robot discouraged them and better when the robot encouraged them.
"One participant said, 'I don't like what the robot is saying, but that's the way it was programmed so I can't blame it,'" said lead study author Aaron M. Roth.
Some of the 40 study participants were technically sophisticated and fully understood that a machine was the source of their discomfort.
The researchers found that, overall, human performance ebbed regardless of technical sophistication.
The study is a departure from typical human-robot interaction studies, which tend to focus on how humans and robots can best work together.
"This is one of the first studies of human-robot interaction in an environment where they are not cooperating," said co-author Fei Fang, assistant professor in the Institute for Software Research.
"We can expect home assistants to be cooperative," she said, "but in situations such as online shopping, they may not have the same goals as we do".
The researchers used the game called "Guards and Treasures" which is a typical game used to study defender-attacker interaction in research on security games.
Each participant played the game 35 times with the robot, while either soaking in encouraging words from the robot or getting their ears singed with dismissive remarks.
Although the human players' rationality improved as the number of games played increased, those who were criticized by the robot didn't score as well as those who were praised.
"It's well established that an individual's performance is affected by what other people say, but the study shows that humans also respond to what machines say," said Afsaneh Doryab, systems scientist at CMU's Human-Computer Interaction Institute (HCII).
1 hour ago
Munmun Dutta calls out ‘disgusting' acts of Indians at tourist spots: Such acts attract racism abroad
1 hour ago
Lisa Ray says midlife is not a crisis but ‘the most important act of a woman’s life’
1 hour ago
R J Balaji trashes rumours that Suriya's 'Karuppu' is to release on April 10; promises update on release shortly
1 hour ago
When Govinda said ‘men are weak without women’ citing Lord Shiva’s example
1 hour ago
Chiranjeevi pens adorable birthday post for daughter Sushmita
1 hour ago
Akshay Kumar reflects on how life changes for men after marriage
1 hour ago
Shah Rukh Khan to play a cop in Rajinikanth's 'Jailer 2'?
1 hour ago
West Asia conflict: Pakistan announces limited use of govt vehicles, school closures amid energy crisis
1 hour ago
Electoral fraud everywhere in SIR, claims Kharge in RS; House Chairman responds
1 hour ago
Centre orders uninterrupted supply of piped natural gas, LPG for cooking
1 hour ago
Rahul Gandhi attends wedding of farmer's daughter in Haryana; relishes 'churma', enjoys folk songs
1 hour ago
Are we going to depend on Trump’s plan? Oppn flags LPG shortage, seeks debate in Parliament
1 hour ago
Cong moves resolution in LS seeking Speaker's removal; heated debate erupts over power of Chair
